Well done, Moody Park Residents’ Association, well done.

In 1890 David McLaughlin purchased some land in New Westminster near the newly-created Moody Park. It’s rumoured that he, being a ship’s carpenter and handy with building things out of wood, built the house that still stands on that property today at 1031 Sixth Avenue. The house is typical of those of the time, in a simplified Queen Anne style with ‘Victorian’ features such as an asymmetrical floorplan, bay windows with decorative cast iron cresting, and mansard roofs.

It’s also remained relatively untouched over its 125-year lifetime, with the only major renovation being the addition of a workshop by McLaughlin himself in 1915.

David McLaughlin House at 1031 Sixth Avenue, New Westminster
David McLaughlin House at 1031 Sixth Avenue, New Westminster

So when the current owner wanted to expand living space for his family, he applied for a demolition permit to build a larger house on the site. As the house is on the City of New Westminster’s Heritage Register the permit was immediately put on hold pending the issuance of a building permit that authorizes the construction of a building to replace the building that is being demolished (City of New Westminster Heritage Procedures Bylaw No. 7606, 2013). This brought the pending demolition to the city’s attention, and council directed city staff to determine how the heritage house could be saved.

The owner of the property then agreed to enter a Heritage Revitalization Agreement (HRA), and had plans developed that would move the heritage house to the rear of the lot and raise it by 11 inches to allow for a new foundation and crawl space, and adding a new house at the front of the lot. The new house would be approximately 2160 square feet (footprint of 887 square feet), with the heritage house being approximately 1500 square feet (footprint of 800 square feet). These plans are found in the March 14, 2016 Council meeting minutes.

These plans didn’t meet all of the criteria for a standard HRA, as the heritage house would become “subordinate” to the new house. Also, it’s roughly twice the size of what a standard laneway house would be and it wouldn’t visually address the lane behind the property. Despite these shortcomings, city staff recommended that the HRA continue through the process as it would protect the historically significant house.

The application was then reviewed by the Moody Park Residents’ Association at a meeting on March 31, 2016. At this meeting, and I quote from the New Westminster Council meeting agenda from April 18, 2016:

Concerns were expressed about the size (height and massing) of the historic house, its setback from the lane, the over view into the neighbours’ rear yards from the historic house, and allowing two houses on one property with its accompanying higher density. Many were concerned that this proposal would set a precedent for future laneway houses. Some expressed concern about the lack of off-street parking and others about the low visibility of the heritage house from the street if it were relocated to the rear of the lot.

The Moody Park Residents’ Association then voted against the application.

Because of this lack of support from the neighbourhood, the owner is withdrawing the HRA and is renewing his request for a demolition permit, which New Westminster Council granted.

New Westminster residents have been crying out about heritage houses being torn town in our city for years now. People always complain when an old house is torn down to have a larger house be built in its place. So when it comes time to preserve a historically significant house, one that was built before 1900, you would think that people would jump at the chance. Unfortunately the NIMBYs in Moody Park don’t seem to care about preserving the history in our city. They would rather complain that the house already on the property is too high and would overlook their back yards more than it already does, even though the house would be positioned such that walls with fewer windows would have faced the closest properties. They would rather complain about a lack of off-street parking because they might lose one or two on-street parking spots. They would rather complain about low visibility of the historic house, even though the alternative is demolishing the historic house.

I highly suspect that the major driver behind this is the ongoing Official Community Plan consultations. A few months ago the president of the MPRA got a bunch of Moody Park residents’ hackles up when he sent out an email and handed out pamphlets strongly implying that the city was planning to force laneway houses (or worse — QUADPLEXES AND TOWNHOUSES!) down their throats after the OCP had finished. This resulted in a huge amount of pushback from Moody Park residents against the entire densification story that’s hitting Metro Vancouver lately, and this is seen here as well. I quote again: “Many were concerned that this proposal would set a precedent for future laneway houses.” I would love to check the MPRA’s minutes for this meeting but unfortunately they’re stuck in 1991 and don’t have a website.

So instead of preserving a house that was built 125 years ago by moving it and adding a single house to the neighbourhood, Moody Park Residents’ Association members would rather see that historical house be demolished.


2 thoughts on “Well done, Moody Park Residents’ Association, well done.
  1. Hello,
    I’ve lived beside this property for for 23 years, I’m not in favor of moving this house to the rear of the property as it’s a huge house that would shadow my small piece of yard, the house is fine where it resides now. The owner/ builder and developer bought this property May 30 2014
    and has changed his mind three times on saving this lovely 125 year old heritage home, The owner’s original plan was to raise the house, build a basement suite and add an addition at the rear of the house. When I spoke with the owner/builder he was receiving accolades and acceptance from all his neighbours about his plans going forward renovating this house. As the owner/builder he operated his small backhoe to dig around the wood foundation of this heritage house and hit hardpan at 6 feet and gave up on this idea! ( if he builds a new house City of New Westminster building code requires to dig past the hardpan for a new foundation.) in the year 2016 large backhoe’s are available to get past the hardpan and this house can be saved where it has resided for 125 years ! Why does the owner have to move the house? It’s a beautiful heritage home that’s had it’s walls, electrical, plumbing, windows and other exterior heritage metal railings removed without City approval or permission, the owner continued to remove exterior roofing to complete his demolition by neglect. Yes, now it makes sense blame the neighbours and use NIMBY as an excuse. Shame on the City for allowing this property owner that continued from early 2015 to the demolish the rear of this lovely heritage home and now this delapited state it’s now in, the owner/builder did this and no one else! Blaming other only deflects the conversation from the person who should be held accountable for his actions on this property! To say the only option to save this 125 year heritage house is to move it to the rear of the property for the owner is purely for financial gain to create a revenue property with two houses and 2 bedroom basement suite in the newly house. It has to be a level playing field to allow a house on the lane you must allow all laneway housing for all single family zoned lots. The owner/ builder can flip this property in one year and give us all the bird and move onto his next building project.
    I truly want to see the house saved and brought back to it’s original glory where it resides.


  2. It was just brought to my attention today (August 17th) that my Grandparents family home which they occupied from the mid-1930’s until my Grandfather’s death in 1983. The Bull family raised 7 children in this home and it breaks my heart to hear that it has been demolished. We were under the impression that it was designated a heritage home in New Westminster and was protected so some one with heart and the means to preserve it to it’s glory days could work magic. My cousin and I discussed this and feel that if the house was in the Queen’s Park area, this would have never happened. We also feel the owner who was a contractor bought the house in 2014 with the full intention of one day demolishing it. The “lane” house application was a diversion. As a contractor he would know the “ins and outs” of New Westminster building codes and permits,etc and knew what he was dealing with. Shame on you! As to the Moody Park Residents Council and New Westminster Council …..you really blew this one! Why in the world was it not protected fully as a heritage home in New Westminster?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *